the world that you see
Apr. 3rd, 2012 03:38 pmMelbourne, Australia is fond of their rooftop bars as they are proud of their weather. A place that is generally pleasant all year-round needs open air spaces that let you sip a glass of wine outside as the aura of the city envelops you. I was sitting at a tapas bar with a coworker, two days into a work gig and the space between us was littered with plates and an empty carafe of sangria. It had been a day heavy with meetings, and we were doing our best not to talk about work. We talked, instead, about vacation, and how, in these moments of having a bit of dinner in a new city with different routines and customs, you could sometimes forget that you were here for a job and could, instead, take a break from it all.
"I always go to Florida," he said, "for the last six years. A buddy of mine lives down near Miami and right around April, after I've been beaten up by winter for four months, I go down there for some sun and sea. I always think that I might want to change it up a bit. See the rest of the world. Went to Amsterdam and Paris once, that was nice, but that trip was (his ex-girlfriend)'s idea; but every time I think about where I want to go, I want it to be familiar."
"I've got the exact opposite problem," I said, "I've gone to places like Buenos Aires and Tokyo and Iceland, and I'm never there long enough to have my fill of it. I always leave with a yearning to come back and do more. But, whenever I consider where to go again, new places are always much more tempting."
"After a while, though, are any of them all that new? Cities are cities."
"You've just spent way too much time on crappy business trips, living out of a suitcase and defining a city as a client's office, a corporate hotel and the cab rides in between."
But I thought about that for a while -- depth versus breadth, spreading out versus focusing. The ready answer is that we all have our individual balance on those preferences. There is no right answer. There's only what makes sense for us; but that point of equilibrium can change with time.
I've only been back in town for two weeks, but I'm already thinking of where I want to go next. I'm also conscious that, for various reasons, this may either be my last year for international travel for a while or my last year for domestic travel in a while, and that's kind of messing with my priorities.
"I always go to Florida," he said, "for the last six years. A buddy of mine lives down near Miami and right around April, after I've been beaten up by winter for four months, I go down there for some sun and sea. I always think that I might want to change it up a bit. See the rest of the world. Went to Amsterdam and Paris once, that was nice, but that trip was (his ex-girlfriend)'s idea; but every time I think about where I want to go, I want it to be familiar."
"I've got the exact opposite problem," I said, "I've gone to places like Buenos Aires and Tokyo and Iceland, and I'm never there long enough to have my fill of it. I always leave with a yearning to come back and do more. But, whenever I consider where to go again, new places are always much more tempting."
"After a while, though, are any of them all that new? Cities are cities."
"You've just spent way too much time on crappy business trips, living out of a suitcase and defining a city as a client's office, a corporate hotel and the cab rides in between."
But I thought about that for a while -- depth versus breadth, spreading out versus focusing. The ready answer is that we all have our individual balance on those preferences. There is no right answer. There's only what makes sense for us; but that point of equilibrium can change with time.
I've only been back in town for two weeks, but I'm already thinking of where I want to go next. I'm also conscious that, for various reasons, this may either be my last year for international travel for a while or my last year for domestic travel in a while, and that's kind of messing with my priorities.